|
|
What makes these
temple cities unique is their square shape, first, and their boundary,
second. The boundary will become important later because
it can be measured and this may be symbolic. As for the square,
its equal sides lend themselves well to an ordered sense of balance
and harmony. Little wonder, then, that these places typify heavenly
order here on earth.
It is not easy today, however, to truly understand this sense of sacred
space. So to illustrate this, I suggest focusing on something
more familiar to us, namely the boundaries in sporting events. While
sport has been thoroughly secularized, it has not always been so. The
Olympics, for example, sprang from a festival in honor of the Greek
god, Zeus; and the earliest known team-sport— Ulama—was
a ruthless game of life or death to early Mesoamericans that remained
popular from time of the Olmecs, beginning about 1500 B.C., right through
the
Teotihuacán, Mayan, Toltec, and Aztec civilizations until the Spanish
Conquest in 1521 A.D.
But isn’t it interesting that the sacred square boundaries of
the temple cities is also shared by many of our most popular sporting
areas? The baseball “diamond”, to give the simplest
example, is actually a perfect square with a circle in the middle (the
mound). Handball courts consist of double squares. Indeed,
most elongated playing fields approximate double squares, from field
hockey to basketball to football with its 100 yards…
And, as before, the Asians seem more sensitive to this type of thinking:
judo, karate, and kung-fu matches take place within square bounds (much
like wrestling). Similarly, the Japanese sport of Sumo (hearkening
back to indigenous Shinto rites) occurs within a circular area outlined
in a square “ring”—much like a boxing “ring” (that
is actually a square).
But none of this matters until you take into account the fact that “play” within
these boundaries is legitimate, while play that goes outside them is “foul”. These
fair and foul areas are the rough equivalent to sacred and profane spaces
in religious contexts. And that explains why taking one’s
shoes off in some sacred places is considered “fair”, while
behaving badly in the same bounded space is considered “foul”:
it is out of bounds.
|
| |
THIS PAGE:
Sports & sacred boundaries. |
|